Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
There are significant differences in the Federal Reserve’s Board members’ and the Bank of England’s policymakers’ views on the outlook for stablecoins
On Sunday, at the 32nd Dubrovnik Economic Conference, Federal Reserve Board member Christopher Waller and Bank of England policymaker Megan Greene engaged in a heated debate on stablecoins.
At this economics conference, during a panel discussion titled "Stablecoins and Monetary Policy," they delivered completely opposite judgments about the future development prospects of stablecoins.
Waller believes that stablecoins themselves carry no risk; they are simply a payment tool that can bring competition to the payments sector. He noted that the global adoption of dollar stablecoins will expand the international influence of U.S. monetary policy, leading more countries to indirectly accept the dollar.
However, Greene holds a completely opposite view. She expects the popularity of stablecoins to fade rapidly within a few years, and even after five years, people may wonder, "Why did we discuss stablecoins in the first place?"
She is more optimistic about tokenized deposits, likening them to a "rhinoceros" in a tortoise-and-hare race, and believes they are most likely to win. By contrast, stablecoins are just a fleeting "rabbit," while central bank digital currencies are slow-moving "turtles."
Notably, the disagreement between the two central bank leaders is not an isolated theoretical debate—it is intertwined with real legislative predicaments inside the United States.
Specifically, because there is controversy within the U.S. over stablecoin yield policies, progress on the important cryptocurrency bill, the CLARITY Act, has been stalled.
The bill is intended to establish a federal regulatory framework for digital assets. Although it passed the Senate Banking Committee in May, whether it will ultimately become law by 2026 remains unclear due to opposition from banking industry lobbying groups and the proximity of midterm elections.
In the face of this legislative impasse, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis issued a warning that if U.S. lawmakers do not establish global standards for digital asset regulation, they will be overtaken by other countries, including China.
On social media, she emphasized that the U.S. has built a dollar-led global financial system, and now it must pass the CLARITY Act as quickly as possible to build the next system before Beijing takes action.
#稳定币 # Viewpoint disagreement