A man in Qingdao, China, stole 107 BTC while helping an acquaintance register a wallet and was sentenced to 10 years and 9 months for theft.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Mars Finance News: The People’s Procuratorate of the Licang District, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China, recently handled a Bitcoin theft case. The defendant, Zhang Moumou, obtained the mnemonic phrase while assisting an acquaintance in registering a virtual currency wallet, and then transferred 107 BTC in multiple transactions, which at current market prices was worth more than 50 million yuan RMB. Zhang Moumou argued that his actions were a form of “protective custody,” but the prosecution found that he transferred the stolen BTC through multiple trading platforms and exchanged it for more than 660,000 yuan RMB. In the first instance, the Licang District Court sentenced Zhang Moumou to 10 years and 9 months in prison for theft and imposed a fine of 100,000 yuan RMB; in the second instance, the original verdict was upheld.

According to reports, the prosecutor handling this case strictly followed laws and judicial policies. After conducting in-depth analysis, the prosecutor determined that although China’s regulatory policies negate the legal-tender status of virtual currencies, they do not negate their property attributes, nor do they prohibit citizens from legally holding and transferring them. Bitcoin requires investment in computing power, funds, and other costs to obtain, giving it economic value. Rights holders can achieve exclusive control and management through private keys and mnemonic phrases, which aligns with the core characteristics of “property” under criminal law and can therefore be an object of theft crimes. In determining the amount involved, because virtual currencies do not have official pricing, the Licang District Procuratorate did not use market-price estimates and instead used the actual proceeds from selling the stolen goods—an amount of 660,000+ yuan RMB—as the theft amount, thereby ensuring accurate conviction, appropriate sentencing, and the unity of crime and punishment.

BTC-0.56%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
0xCandleQuiet
· 1h ago
10 years and 9 months to exchange for 107 BTC, now worth a huge loss at current prices
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-dcb4d0d5
· 10h ago
The procuratorate's classification of property attributes has reference significance for subsequent cases in the cryptocurrency circle.
View OriginalReply0
BluePeonyDarkroom
· 11h ago
50 million target, sentenced at 660k, virtual currency valuation is indeed a headache
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6857a9c9
· 11h ago
Showing someone your mnemonic phrase is like hanging the key at the door; this guy really has a big heart.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3d750846
· 11h ago
Transferring in multiple transactions clearly shows premeditation; the sentencing is appropriate.
View OriginalReply0
MetalKeyInsomnia
· 11h ago
660k converts to the theft amount, so who owns the remaining price fluctuations of the coin?
View OriginalReply0
BridgeAnxiety
· 11h ago
Assisting with registering while secretly recording the mnemonic phrase, it's hard to guard against acquaintances committing the crime.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-665eb149
· 11h ago
The appellate court upheld the explanation, recognizing the property attribute determination, case law +1
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned