Recently, on-chain folks keep saying "another coincidence transfer," and after a while, I developed a bit of OCD: coincidences can often be broken down into paths. First, look at where the money comes from—whether it's the same withdrawal / the same cross-chain bridge; then see where it goes—whether it all loops back to the same collateral position, the same liquidity pool, and finally disperses in the same rhythm. Connecting these together, you'll find that many "random" movements are actually about managing or avoiding risk, especially for those on the edge of liquidation who love to play this kind of roadmap. Recently, the on-chain gaming sector also feels quite close to a collapse; with inflation + studios + coin price spirals kicking in, on-chain capital flows look even more like they're searching for an exit... What I don't regret is spending an extra half hour mapping out transfer paths rather than relying on intuition to bet, because staying calm never leads to too much loss anyway.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned