I used to really think that DAO voting was just "everyone discussing together," but after seeing more proposals, I realize that what you're voting on isn't right or wrong, but incentives and positions. The ones written more gently tend to hide key points in attachments/parameters: who can get subsidies, who can join the committee, whose permissions are moved from multi-signature to a "temporary group"... Basically, it's about first setting up the power structure, then letting you stamp it. The recent heated debate over staking is the same; the compounded returns sound appealing, but what's often seen in voting is actually "who gets to share this layer of profit, who takes the blame," anyway, once liquidity flows out, retail investors are left with just "approved." Before I vote now, I first consider three things: where the money flows, who holds the keys, and where the exit door is, otherwise I’d rather abstain... Forget it.