Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
AI Agents can now press buttons and go on the blockchain by themselves, so can people finally relax completely?
I think it's still early... To be honest, it's more like an automatic transmission; someone still needs to hold the steering wheel. Especially regarding permissions and limits: giving it full control over a hot wallet is too scary, I now prefer to think of it as a "executor," with humans responsible for setting limits, whitelists, and emergency brakes. Furthermore, contract risks and signature content: no matter how smart it is, it could still be tricked into authorizing via phishing pages or fake routers; and for cross-chain or route-switching with slippage or retries, the machine will keep "trying," but you need to cover your downside so it doesn't keep losing in a bad market. Recently, during testnet incentives and point farming, it's the same story—everyone is betting on whether the mainnet will issue tokens. Agents are great for running processes, but when it really counts, I prefer to slow down: first clearly define the acceptable loss, then let it do the work, and don't let points replace your thinking.