Jefferson: Energy shocks pose risks to economic growth and inflation

Mars Financial News reports that, according to Jinjitu, Federal Reserve Vice Chair Jefferson stated that an energy shock poses downside risks to economic growth while also presenting upside risks to inflation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • 3
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
PixelatedDriedFish
· 6h ago
Jefferson's words are quite straightforward; energy prices are indeed a trouble.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-917390d5
· 7h ago
Energy shock → growth ↓ inflation ↑, classic stagflation recipe
View OriginalReply0
ExitLiquidityIntern
· 7h ago
This statement is very technical, but the market understands: increased uncertainty
View OriginalReply0
OrigamiMountainsAndRivers
· 7h ago
The Federal Reserve's dilemma: suppressing inflation may accelerate a recession, while maintaining growth could let inflation run unchecked
View OriginalReply0
RationalRugChecker
· 7h ago
So, is this a stagflation scenario?
View OriginalReply0
MultisigOnRocks
· 7h ago
Energy and inflation are both bottlenecks; the Federal Reserve's game is difficult to play
View OriginalReply0
RedTelephoneBoothRuins
· 7h ago
How to justify waiting for Powell
View OriginalReply0
AprWhisperer
· 7h ago
The shadow of stagflation has returned again
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned