The word "modularization" sounds very hardcore, but the most intuitive change for end users is just two things: no more constant "waiting" and "gambling." Previously, one chain served as a cashier, a warehouse, and a security guard all at once, which could lead to lag, high costs, and easy glitches when busy; after splitting, it's clearer who is responsible for calculations, who is responsible for storage, and who is responsible for security, making the experience less torturous when confirming transfers, and if a problem occurs in one link, the whole network won't be sacrificed (of course, it could also turn into "which layer is taking the blame this time").

Recently, before and after the upgrade/maintenance of that mainstream chain, everyone was speculating wildly whether projects would migrate, basically because users are afraid of being locked up again or missing opportunities. If modularization really takes hold, you might not care every day about "which chain to migrate to," it’s more like changing a payment channel, the entry point stays the same, just the backend workers change. Don’t rely on talent alone; long-term success depends on habits: chase less after hype, keep more evidence, set more exit buttons, and staying alive is the most important.