Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
When I evaluate whether a project is serious about its work, I don't look at the roadmap at first. I look at how the treasury spends money. Where the funds are sent, how they are split into different transactions, whether they keep transferring to the same new wallet... Basically, it's about checking the accounts: whether development, auditing, and operations expenses align with milestones, and whether there's a sense of "pay first, then slowly build." Recently, narratives like AI Agents and automated trading have been popular, but the more automated it gets, the more I worry about permissions being handed out randomly. Contracts with a bunch of approve, proxy contract upgrade rights still controlled by the project team—that's a red line for me. I need to be reminded: don't be fooled by the words "we are iterating." First, look at the flow of funds and permissions, then discuss the story.