Recently, everyone has been talking about AI Agents going on-chain to automatically do work, and I just want to ask: if something really goes wrong, who takes responsibility… For contract interactions, signature permissions, authorization limits, routing choices, failure rollbacks—no matter how smart the agent is, it can still be misled into making a mistake, and ultimately, human confirmation/limits/whitelists are still needed to at least lock in "how much can be lost." Especially with multi-signature and governance proposals, don’t expect the model to judge motives; you have to fill in the evidence chain yourself.

Thinking about it later, it’s quite funny—on one hand, shouting about decentralization, and on the other, handing the keys over to a hallucinating robot.
By the way, the NFT royalty debate is heating up: creators want income, markets want liquidity, and if the agent automatically places orders or sweeps floors, who ultimately decides whether to support royalties or not?
Anyway, I now mostly have it do monitoring and simulation; real signing is still on me.