I've been lurking in the group for a long time, and I still can’t help but say this: an AI Agent really can help me keep an eye on the market and compare on-chain data and do those messy, tiring tasks—but in the end, I still have to take care of the “sign/authorize” step myself to cover the risk. To put it simply, the most likely way things go wrong isn’t that it miscalculates; it’s that it’s too “obedient.” Give it a loose allowance, or let it switch chains or change routes on its own, and when it runs into phishing contracts, fake frontends, or weird proxy contracts, ordinary people can’t really tell at a glance.



And with everyone talking so much lately about staking unlocks and token unlock calendars—and that kind of anxiety about potential sell pressure—I understand. The Agent may automatically reduce positions based on the rules, but you can’t outsource emotions and risk preferences… My approach is pretty laid-back: let it only handle reminders and simulations. If I truly need to move positions, I confirm manually. I’d rather be slower—after all, what I’m waiting for is a “higher-certainty entry point,” not random clicking all day. That’s it for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned