Proposing a DAO proposal is sometimes more exciting than watching candlestick charts... On the surface, it's "parameter optimization/funding," but underneath, it's really about writing how incentives are divided, who has the keys, and who can threaten you. The "support rate" on the voting page looks pretty good, but I prefer to watch: who is proposing, who is endorsing, whether voting rights are controlled by a few addresses, and whether the execution power is circling back to a small multisig group. To put it plainly, proposals are like painting the power structure with narrative sugar coating.

In extreme cases of funding rates, the chat group starts arguing again about whether to reverse or continue squeezing the bubble. I think the emotional heat map could be directly pasted onto the DAO: the more excited everyone is, the easier it is to mistake "temporary incentives" for "long-term governance." Now I force myself to wait a night before confirming my vote—it's okay, taking it slow isn't shameful.