When I look at whether a project is working seriously, my first thought isn't how lively Twitter is, but how the treasury funds are being spent and whether the milestones match up. For example, if this month’s plan is to launch the testnet / conduct an audit / publish documentation, but the treasury expenses are all labeled as "market cooperation" and a bunch of incomprehensible transfers, I assume they are just stalling for time... Conversely, even if progress is slow, but the expenses can be verified as audit fees, milestone subsidies, development bounties, and other tangible actions, I’m actually willing to interact a few more times. Recently, hardware wallets are almost out of stock, phishing links are everywhere, and group members are starting to remind each other not to click randomly. At times like this, I feel even more that a team that spends money on security and delivery at least has the right attitude. For now, let's keep the task list rolling and updating.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned