Recently, I've seen a bunch of discussions about re-staking and shared security again, talking like LEGO blocks stacking up one by one. Basically, the profits can stack, but so can the risks. Don’t let it stack up to the point where only the illusion of "I should earn more" remains. I love seeing old protocols revive this approach, but right now I only dare to test with low positions—ones I can sleep peacefully with.

By the way, the NFT royalty debate has flared up again: creators want continuous income, but the market complains that secondary sales are not liquid... To me, it sounds like two sides of the same coin, and in the end, no one is satisfied.

There’s just too much information, and it’s a bit stressful. My current filtering method is pretty crude: first, see if a power outage or malicious act would take away a bunch of things at once; then, see if I can accept the worst-case scenario. If I can’t pass these two hurdles, I ignore even high APYs. That’s how I do it for now.