I tried once: splitting the same small transaction into two "heavily modular" chains, one optimized for fast execution and the other for cheaper data, and the result for a end-user like me was just two words: disjointed. The wallet pop-ups increased, waiting for confirmations across different chains, transaction fees are indeed lower, but the mental effort has gone up... Frankly, modularization breaks down "how the backend is built," but what I see are bridges, routers, various signatures, and the risk surface also expands, and I don't even know how to draw the correlation matrix to define what counts as "the same category." As for the recent social mining and fan tokens, shouting about attention being equivalent to mining is quite lively, but just thinking about how volatile attention itself is and how unauditable it can be makes me even more anxious: the chain has become more modular, but people are more easily led astray by the noise of modularization. That's it for now, I guess I'll be back to backtesting until I get exhausted tonight.