Over the past couple of days, I’ve been seeing a bunch of Meme + celebrity signal-calling flooding the timeline—like someone hit the “attention rotation” hotkey… Veteran players say don’t take the last step, but for now I’ll just keep my hand tucked back in my pocket.

Before, I judged a project’s trustworthiness by who had the loudest voice in the group. Now it’s basically a “version update” for myself: first, go check GitHub—not to see how brilliant the code is (I can’t read it anyway)—just to see whether it’s alive: has anyone actually been working recently, are issues being answered, and it’s not just a stack of empty repositories posed for show. Then look at the audit reports. Don’t just stare at the cover logo—focus on whether they clearly lay out the issues, whether they’ve been fixed, and whether there’s a follow-up re-audit. Otherwise it’s like a “health report that only takes photos and never re-checks.”

And as for the multi-signature upgrade part, I treat it as a social question of “who can flip the switch”: who the signers are, whether they’re distributed or centralized, and whether there’s a buffer like a time lock. Basically, the slower and the more transparent it is—the less uneasy I feel. That’s it for now: the experience ticket is fine, but I won’t go all-in.