Russia has approved a crypto bill! Permitting cross-border cryptocurrency settlements, but domestic payments remain fully prohibited

Russia's State Duma (Parliament) approved a first reading of a cryptocurrency regulation bill in April 2026, permitting companies to use digital assets for cross-border trade settlements while maintaining the red line of banning crypto payments domestically. The Central Bank of Russia will serve as the primary regulator, overseeing licensing of crypto platforms and transaction monitoring. This move, against the backdrop of the EU's 20th round of sanctions that fully block Russia's crypto industry, marks Moscow's latest attempt to seek sanctions circumvention channels.
(Background: The EU imposes its largest sanctions on Russia in two years: fully banning crypto platforms, and placing A7A5 stablecoins and digital rubles on the blacklist)
(Additional background: Putin personally signs new law! Authorizing Russian courts to confiscate cryptocurrencies during criminal investigations)

Table of Contents

Toggle

• First Reading of the Bill: Emergence of a Crypto Regulatory Framework
• Cross-Border Settlements: The Bill’s Biggest Highlight
• Domestic Ban Remains Firm: The Ruble Cannot Be Shaken
• International Perspective: Sanction Risks and Compliance Challenges

Russia is establishing a highly regulated digital asset system, but this does not equate to full legalization of cryptocurrencies. Officials’ overall goal is to build a system that facilitates international trade payments while restricting the role of digital assets within the country.

Russia’s crypto regulation model primarily positions digital assets as tools for geopolitical strategy rather than as conventional financial assets. Regulators do not see digital currencies as substitutes for the ruble but define limited use cases specifically for external economic activities.

Unlike other countries actively expanding retail crypto services, Russia prioritizes structural, institutional-level applications linked to cross-border trade. In this framework, cryptocurrencies are viewed as means to enhance the resilience of payment systems, rather than engines for financial innovation.

In fact, as early as 2024, Russia allowed limited foreign trade crypto settlements through experimental mechanisms, while continuing to ban domestic crypto payments. This bill marks a key step from experimentation toward formal legislation.

First Reading of the Bill: Emergence of a Crypto Regulatory Framework

The first reading bill approved by Russia’s State Duma in April 2026 covers rules for cryptocurrency circulation, standards for market participants, and the responsibilities of regulatory agencies. Its core feature is centralized regulatory control.

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) is positioned as the main regulator, responsible for licensing operators, transaction monitoring, and enforcement of compliance. The system emphasizes regulated participation through licensed intermediaries rather than open or decentralized operations.

At the same time, Russian authorities maintain clear boundaries for domestic use. The ruble remains the only legal tender within Russia, and cryptocurrencies are not permitted for everyday transactions between individuals and businesses. The Central Bank has repeatedly warned that allowing digital assets for domestic payments could weaken currency stability and regulatory efficiency. This reflects Moscow’s deliberate design to separate domestic economic activities from external settlement channels.

Cross-Border Settlements: The Bill’s Biggest Highlight

The most notable clause in the bill permits the use of digital assets for settling foreign trade transactions. Companies engaged in cross-border business will be allowed to pay via cryptocurrencies, especially when traditional payment channels are obstructed.

This move is directly motivated by Western sanctions pressure. Since 2024, many major trading partners’ banks have become more cautious in handling Russian transactions due to secondary sanctions risks. Russian officials later admitted that alternative settlement methods—including cryptocurrencies—have been practically adopted in international payments.

Under the bill’s design, cross-border crypto settlements will be carried out by a series of licensed operators, who must obtain permits from the Central Bank of Russia and undergo regulation. These operators are responsible for customer identity verification (KYC), transaction record keeping, and anti-money laundering (AML) reporting. All transactions must go through regulated licensed entities, with peer-to-peer cross-border crypto transfers between individuals prohibited.

Domestic Ban Remains Firm: The Ruble Cannot Be Shaken

It is noteworthy that Russian authorities firmly refuse to incorporate cryptocurrencies into the domestic payment system. The bill explicitly states that cryptocurrencies cannot be used for paying for goods, services, or any domestic debts.

Elvira Nabiullina, Governor of the Central Bank of Russia, has clearly stated that digital currencies pose a greater threat to domestic monetary policy than their convenience. Under her leadership, the Russian central bank remains highly vigilant against any financial innovations that could undermine the ruble’s position.

This stance is also reflected in Russia’s attitude toward central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Unlike other BRICS countries actively testing cross-border CBDC projects, Russia’s digital ruble initiative remains primarily focused on domestic wholesale payment scenarios, not as a tool for sanctions evasion.

International Perspective: Sanction Risks and Compliance Challenges

While the bill opens the door for Russian companies to use crypto for cross-border settlements, its actual effectiveness remains uncertain given the reality of international sanctions.

Western regulators are closely monitoring Russia’s crypto foreign trade activities, especially transactions involving sanctioned entities or financial intermediaries. The widespread use of cryptocurrencies in foreign trade will still face intense scrutiny from Western authorities. Exchanges, custodians, and payment intermediaries may be subject to sanctions reviews, reporting obligations, or restrictions by foreign jurisdictions.

Practical operations of crypto-based trade settlements also face limitations such as liquidity shortages, custody requirements, transaction monitoring, and price volatility. Compared to traditional trade finance tools, the volatility and compliance costs of cryptocurrencies remain key factors for companies to consider.

From Taiwan’s perspective, Russia’s move provides a noteworthy case of financial alternatives within the global sanctions framework. As the EU’s 20th round of sanctions fully blocks Russia’s crypto industry, Moscow’s formalization of a crypto cross-border settlement channel through legislation could inspire other sanctioned countries (like Iran, North Korea) to follow suit, potentially shifting the global dialogue on crypto regulation.