Wu Shuo learned that Polkadot posted on Twitter that Polkadot OpenGov is currently voting on a major adjustment to the network staking architecture.


Proposal 1890 requests that Polkadot validators lock at least 10,000 DOT of their own funds as self-stake.
This reform is a mandatory prerequisite for the next major staking upgrade, which includes changes such as nominators no longer bearing the risk of slashing, and the unbonding period being shortened from about 28 days to approximately 24 to 48 hours.
If the proposal passes, validators will directly bear the risk of slashing through higher self-bond exposure, while nominators can continue earning staking rewards without exposing their principal to slashing risk, thereby reducing participation risk and speeding up exit.
DOT-1.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
0xNap
· 4h ago
Wait, so now those running nodes need to quickly add staking? When is the deadline?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cf218ace
· 6h ago
Unbinding time reduced to 24-48 hours, liquidity friendliness directly takes off
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-870b5e71
· 6h ago
The validator threshold is mentioned as 10k DOT; small nodes must be crying now.
View OriginalReply0
Lemon-FlavoredStopLoss
· 6h ago
From 28 days to 2 days, finally no longer locked away until the end of time
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-470bc925
· 6h ago
This move of forcing preconditions is ruthless. If you don't upgrade, don't expect to play.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroSlippage
· 6h ago
Staking $10k isn't a big deal for big players, but it puts enormous pressure on individual nodes. Centralization risk?
View OriginalReply0
EraPuzzleMaster
· 6h ago
Nominee faces zero risk of penalties? This design has some substance, essentially passing all the risk onto the validators.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned