Recently, I've been looking at the narrative around modularization and the DA layer, developers are excitedly creating new terms, while users (including myself) are completely confused: who is actually backing me up?

Later, I realized that when checking "credibility," don't just look at Twitter slogans, first go to GitHub: it's not about how many stars it has, but whether there are continuous commits, whether people are seriously arguing over bugs in issues, and whether key changes have gone through review processes.
Don't just look at the cover logo of audit reports; honestly, focus on two points: whether the scope is clearly written, and whether the issues found have actually been fixed (whether there are corresponding commits).
As for multi-signature upgrades, when I see "upgradable," I reflexively get nervous; it's best if the multi-sig members are public, the threshold is high enough, and ideally add a timelock so everyone has time to react.
Anyway, I often vote late, but ignoring these points is basically signing off blindly...
We'll talk about this again next time.