According to South Korean media outlet “Seoul Economic,” a petition presented to the National Assembly that calls for the abolition of virtual asset taxation has received the approval of more than 50,000 people within 8 days, meeting the threshold for submission to a parliamentary standing committee for review. The proposed tax regime would impose a 22% tax rate, including local taxes, on virtual asset gains with annual returns exceeding 2.5 million South Korean won (about 1,800 USD). The petitioners believe that ordinary stock investors in South Korea are basically exempt from taxation on transferred gains, while virtual assets are taxed separately, which they say is unfair. They also argue that the current tax system and investor protection mechanisms are still not comprehensive.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
DustCollector7
· 1h ago
The petition has crossed the threshold; now let's see how Congress stalls.
View OriginalReply0
MintCondition
· 16h ago
Stocks are tax-exempt, but the crypto world is taxed at 22%. I don't understand this logic.
View OriginalReply0
ReflectiveChainShadow
· 21h ago
Implementing a tax before establishing proper protection mechanisms is a classic case of wanting it both ways.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0aa20a11
· 05-24 07:30
22% is really harsh; stocks don't even charge this much, it's double standards.
View OriginalReply0
GaslightGardener
· 05-24 07:15
50k people jointly sign, the Korean crypto community's combat effectiveness is impressive
View OriginalReply0
SummerCoast
· 05-24 07:13
If this policy in South Korea is truly abolished, will neighboring Japan follow suit?
View OriginalReply0
Half-SectionSucculent
· 05-24 07:04
Congressional review is expected to take about half a year, so don't rush to pop the champagne yet.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-744c843b
· 05-24 07:04
Support abolishment; let's first ensure investor protection is in place before discussing taxation.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-53a6e1a8
· 05-24 07:04
Starting at $1,800 in taxes, playing with DeFi casually is outrageous
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned