Honestly, lately I've been increasingly skeptical about those "coincidental transfers" on the blockchain; most likely, the path isn't fully unraveled: the same money leaves an exchange's hot wallet, jumps a couple of steps into an aggregator/router contract, then gets split into several new addresses, and finally ends up in the hands of the person you think is "suddenly connected." By tracing the contract interactions in chronological order, many of these can be explained as routine actions like market making, liquidation, or cross-chain bridge liquidity provisioning.



AI agents and automated trading have also been hyped up a lot recently; I’m not sure how much genuine intelligence is involved, but the security issues are always the same: excessive permissions, batch calls that are hard to understand, and a tendency to go through multiple intermediary contracts. My approach is pretty straightforward: first look at the source of the funds, then see if it’s the same routing or gas pattern, and only then consider whether it’s the same person. Start by trimming false positives and don’t get carried away by the narrative.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned