Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, someone was arguing about secondary market royalties, basically: creators want to maintain a steady cash flow, while traders feel that even an extra penny is a bother. I used to be quite supportive of creators, but these days, with stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging rumors circulating in the group, everyone's emotions are running high and they just want to "run first and ask questions later," nobody cares about how the royalties are split. Thinking calmly, royalties are like positions; don’t pour too much water at once. If the rules are too strict, liquidity will be like water pooling in a flowerpot, and over time the roots will suffocate. Anyway, I now care more about whether creators can manage the community into a long-term one, not relying on one-off deals. In the end, it’s still that sentence: watering should be slow, and the heart should be slow too.