Looking at DAO proposals, my first glance isn't at the vision now, but at how incentives are distributed, who can get them, and how long they are unlocked… In other words, the power structure is written in those few lines of small text: Is voting power tied to tokens or contributions? Is the budget given all at once to a multi-signature wallet or disbursed in stages? These decisions determine whether you're truly "participating in governance" or just endorsing others.

Recently, before and after the main chain upgrade/maintenance, the community has been speculating whether the ecosystem will migrate. I just want to say: whether to migrate depends on who benefits more, don’t be swayed by slogans like "for decentralization."

As for how I prevent impulsive trading? Very simple: when I get emotional, I first close the trading page, check on-chain whether funds are flowing in or out, then wait for a candlestick… if I still want to buy after waiting, I do. Anyway, missing out is better than losing more, and making more is more realistic than risking more.