The MiCA and GENIUS bills have completely split the stablecoin track into two halves; in the future, choosing between on-chain cash or bank tokens will depend on whether you prioritize efficiency or compliance.

View Original
MeNews
The divergence in stablecoin architecture intensifies: regulation promotes competition between the "ticket-based cash" and "bank deposit-type tokens" routes
The global financial system is entering a phase of architectural differentiation, with the total market value of stablecoins at approximately $3234 billion. In the future, the digital dollar may have to choose between “holder-based stablecoins” and “bank deposit tokenization”: the former enables instant settlement, reducing intermediary risk and coming close to on-chain cash; the latter follows the traditional banking system, with stricter KYC and clearing, and limited cross-chain interoperability. The MiCA and GENIUS acts accelerate this differentiation: the former delineates electronic money regulation, while the latter requires 100% cash and short-term U.S. Treasury reserves, impacting payment characteristics and cross-border status, while also improving efficiency but introducing liquidity risk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned