Just finished a round of DAO voting, my eyes are a bit sore… To be honest, many proposals seem to be "optimized" on the surface, but in reality, they are redistributing who can receive incentives and who can hold power. The more gently written "subsidies/delegations/committees" are, the more you need to look at one sentence: Is voting power becoming more concentrated in the end? Do opponents face costs or exit channels?

Recently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have been criticized for being outdated or even misleading, and I resonate a bit. Many people use "certain address = certain organization" as an argument to sway votes, but when the tags change, the narrative flips… Now I check where the funds come from and where they flow before voting; don’t put too much faith in those small tags. Anyway, I’m not aiming for quick riches, just hoping not to be confused and withdrawn in governance.