Lately, I've been a bit lazy about installing professional tools when checking projects for "trustworthiness or not," and I treat audit reports like health checkups: whether I've seen the illness, whether I've had follow-up visits, and whether old problems are clearly written out. Don't just stare at the star count on GitHub; flip through the commit history and comments. If they're really working, or just showboating, there's a big difference. Upgrading multi-signature is more practical: who holds the keys, whether rules can be temporarily changed, whether there's a stop button in case of trouble... Basically, it's about "who can change my position's fate with a snap of the brain." When macro expectations of rate cuts come in, both the dollar and risk assets jump together, making sentiment easier to get carried away. I remind myself even more: I treat complexity as an enemy. Only projects that can be explained in one sentence are worth my effort; if I can't explain it clearly, I’ll just pass.