Recently, someone on the blockchain posted some "coincidental transfers" as conspiracy theories again, and I'm a bit annoyed. To be clear, don't rush to call it hacking/money laundering; analyze the path: where it came in from, which intermediaries it passed through, how long each jump took, whether it's the same group of gas habits, and finally which pools or bridges it ended up on. Many "coincidences" are actually the same script running, or the same group of people splitting flows through the same entry point.



The recent cross-chain bridge incident made me even less convinced by the "looks normal" feeling; and after oracle prices went haywire and everyone just "waited for confirmation," it’s really just the blockchain collectively delaying decisions. I used to judge addresses by labels at first glance, but now if the path isn’t clear or the budget/motivation doesn’t match, I just ignore it… for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned