Recently, I’ve again been seeing a bunch of PFPs upgraded into “membership cards” and “brand passes.” To put it bluntly, it’s packaging the emotional value of an avatar into a long-term narrative. It’s not that it can’t work, but I’ve become more and more concerned: besides group chats and whitelists, what actually ends up lasting? In a bear market, the fun is the most expensive. After the tide of attention recedes, what usually remains is just a single image and a bunch of unfulfilled promises.



The same goes for the whole “re-staking” and “shared security” setup—it stacks layer upon layer of returns. I can understand why people complain that it’s a “shell game.” When things are hot, everyone thinks they’re building “infrastructure.” When things cool down, people start calculating risk and asking who’s going to cover the downside.

I no longer believe the kind of claim that “if you just build a community, you’ll definitely have a moat.” Anyway, I still lean toward going slower: I’d rather see the project spell out its product, permissions, and cash flow clearly before deciding whether to tie my identity to it. That’s it for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned