These days, the group is again sharing screenshots about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and various claims of "de-pegging." Honestly, seeing so much of it has made me a bit numb... When emotions run high, everyone just wants to find a "more stable return." But with LST/re-staking, the returns are basically squeezed out from staking rewards, fees, and layered protocol incentives — they don't just appear out of nowhere.



The risks are pretty straightforward: underlying validators/fines and confiscations, smart contract vulnerabilities, insufficient liquidity. You might think you can exit anytime, but that's not really the case. Re-staking adds another layer — using the same security to back more things, which amplifies the risk. If I hadn't hurried to layer another stake on top of my LST, I might sleep a bit more soundly... Anyway, what I care about now is: who is paying for these returns, and who will ultimately take the loss if something goes wrong. For now, just watching and taking it slow.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned