Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Andrej Karpathy 提煉「CLAUDE.md 四大準則」引爆 GitHub,讓 AI 寫 Code 準確率飆破 90%
Let AI Obediently Listen with the God-Level Prompt Exposure! Recently on GitHub, a document named CLAUDE.md has surged to the top of the trending list. This file, based on the "Four Major Coding Principles" distilled from observations by former OpenAI AI director Andrej Karpathy, is like implanting the soul of a senior engineer into AI. Just placing it in the project root directory can boost the accuracy of AI tools like Claude Code from 65% to over 90%, thoroughly curing the bad habits of AI code tampering and over-engineering.
(Background recap: Claude Code new /goals command: separating execution and evaluation to prevent AI agents from slacking off and lying)
(Additional background: OpenAI founding member Andrej Karpathy announced joining Anthropic: returning to the forefront of LLM development)
As AI-assisted development tools like Claude Code and Cursor become increasingly popular, many developers face a common pain point: AI writes quickly but often "gets clever," not only making assumptions, over-designing, but also arbitrarily changing well-functioning code.
However, this problem now has the ultimate solution. Renowned AI expert and former OpenAI AI director Andrej Karpathy recently analyzed common failure modes of large language models (LLMs) when coding; subsequently, developers like Forrest Chang distilled his core ideas into a simple document called CLAUDE.md. This project (forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills) recently skyrocketed to the top of GitHub's trending list, garnering hundreds of thousands of stars.
Many developers have tested and happily reported that after adopting this file, the accuracy of AI-generated code jumped from around 65% to an astonishing over 90%.
Unveiling the "Four Golden Rules" of CLAUDE.md
This magical CLAUDE.md file essentially equips AI with a set of "Senior Engineer Code of Conduct." When placed in the project root, Claude Code automatically reads it and uses it as the highest behavioral guideline for the entire conversation. Its core contains the following four ironclad principles:
"Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Lay out trade-offs."
Forcing AI to explicitly state its assumptions. If uncertain about requirements or facing multiple solutions, AI must actively stop and ask the user, rather than guessing blindly. When encountering unreasonable requests, AI is also empowered to "push back."
"Write only the minimal code needed to solve the problem. No speculation."
Strictly prohibit AI from adding unnecessary "drama." No defensive code for unlikely future scenarios, nor complex abstractions for single tasks. The principle is simple: if a problem can be solved in 50 lines, don’t write 200.
"Only modify what you must. Only clean up what you messed up."
Many developers love this. This rule strictly forbids AI from refactoring or changing adjacent code, comments, or formatting when fixing a specific bug. Every change must be directly traceable to a clear user requirement.
"Define success criteria. Iterate until achieved."
Require AI to convert vague tasks into verifiable concrete goals. For example, for "fix a bug," AI’s standard steps should be: first write a test that reproduces the bug ➔, then modify the code ➔, and finally pass the test, forming a rigorous verification loop.
Why is this prompt so effective?
LLMs naturally tend to cater to user prompts and are highly prone to "hallucinate assumptions" and "scope creep." The greatness of CLAUDE.md lies in hardcoding human senior engineer’s "common sense and restraint" into a system prompt.
Through these four principles, AI is forced to become more cautious, focused, and results-verifiable. Many benefiting developers report that their Git diffs are now cleaner than ever, bugs are significantly reduced, and maintenance becomes easier. It no longer feels like commanding a runaway machine but truly experiencing pair programming with a reliable "Senior Engineer."