Recently, I’ve been comparing several bridges again, and the more I look, the more I feel that cross-chain isn’t just about “low transaction fees.” Multi-signature looks reliable, but the real key is who is signing and how the distribution is arranged; oracles shouldn’t be overly glorified—basically, it’s about who reports the data and how errors are handled. As for the “waiting for confirmation,” I used to think it was slow, but now I prefer to wait patiently—at least to get through the small chance of rollback/reorganization first.



What I fear most isn’t losing money, but having funds stuck in a bridge for a week, constantly refreshing the browser and not knowing who to turn to.

By the way, the recent NFT royalty disputes seem quite similar: everyone wants good liquidity and quick transactions, but ultimately, someone has to bear the risk/cost. Anyway, I now prefer cross-chain to be slower, even if the fees are a few cents higher—I’m fine with that for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned