I want to clarify a point.

Those who follow me closely know that a project with potential will stand behind me when it's cheap, and I will shout as loudly as I can. I tweeted 50 times until JST crossed the $0.05 barrier. When it reached a certain price, I sold 90% of it. Am I now telling you to buy JST? No.
The same applies to CHZ. I have plenty, but since its price remains high compared to other projects in my portfolio, I’m not telling you to buy now.
I highlight the ones that are cheaper and lagging behind, meaning the ones that are still affordable.
JUP, REZ, LUMIA, CFG... When these hit bottom prices and make a move, don’t miss out, and should I tell you to buy more? No. Because my style isn’t chasing the ones that are flying away; it’s about emphasizing potential that’s been forgotten and remains cheap at the bottom.
Remember this: There will come a time when, when you ask what to buy, those quality projects will have already jumped well above bottom prices, and you won’t dare to buy. Before that day comes, I’m here today so that the reward is great. That’s also why I keep updating my portfolio constantly.
Once a certain threshold is crossed, ACH, TKO, and the others will no longer matter to me. Because I have no partnership or sponsorship agreements with any of them. I don’t fall in love with projects; I look at their affordability and potential.
You won’t see me in new projects with skyrocketing prices and meaningless market caps. If I’m looking for a safe haven with high market value, I focus on giants that have gone beyond experimental stages, proven themselves, and have lifelong potential:
$LTC $ETC $NEAR $LINK $UNI

In short, I share projects that I frequently highlight at bottom prices solely because I believe they are cheap.
Please remember, my style is to highlight when they are cheap.
If my voice is loud at the bottom, it’s only because I truly believe in the project’s affordability and potential from the bottom of my heart.