Actually, everyone understands that DAO voting is on the surface "community decision-making," but upon opening the proposal and reading carefully, it's all about how incentives are distributed, who has the authority to sign, who can get information first... Basically, it's just a power structure in disguise. Last night, I was lurking and looked at a proposal; it was written very gently at the beginning, but at the end, an attachment said "Temporary multi-signature to execute first." I immediately closed the webpage and went to play with my cat. Don't worry, I’ll wait for confirmation. Recently, the set of staking/sharing security has been criticized as a "copycat," which I can understand. The returns look good stacked up, but who ultimately bears the risks and holds the voice? If you don’t read carefully before voting, it’s easy to just be a background figure. Anyway, I now just look at who benefits, who takes the blame, and then decide whether to click "Approve."