Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
#GateSquarePizzaDay #TradfiTradingChallenge A 9-member federal jury in Oakland, California, delivered a unanimous verdict dismissing Musk’s multi-billion-dollar lawsuit against OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman.
The Verdict: A "Calendar Technicality"
Remarkably, after 11 days of intense testimony, the jury deliberated for less than two hours before tossing out the case. Crucially, the court did not rule on the core ideological merits of the case—such as whether OpenAI violated its founding mission or if its leadership wrongfully enriched themselves.
Instead, the jury found that Musk waited too long to file his lawsuit, ruling that the claims fell outside the statute of limitations.
The Timeline Dispute: Musk’s legal team argued he only realized OpenAI had broken its "founding contract" in 2022 when Microsoft announced its massive investment. However, OpenAI's defense successfully proved that Musk was well aware of the company’s shift toward a for-profit structure much earlier, given he left the board in 2018 and OpenAI established its commercial arm in 2019.
Key Takeaways from the Trial
The legal proceedings provided a rare, behind-the-scenes look at the internal friction, power struggles, and shifting philosophies of the world’s leading AI lab.
The Debate Over Ideals vs. Reality: Musk insisted his $38 million donation was built on the promise of an open-source, non-profit entity aimed purely at benefiting humanity. OpenAI’s defense countered that Musk himself had previously advocated for converting OpenAI into a for-profit entity under his own control or folding it into Tesla.
Credibility on Trial: The court became a "pageant of hypocrisy" (as described by OpenAI's lawyers), with both sides attacking each other's motives. Musk's team focused heavily on Sam Altman’s candor, pointing back to his brief firing by the OpenAI board in 2023, while OpenAI pointed out that Musk’s own rival AI company, xAI, is strictly for-profit.
The Path Clear for OpenAI’s Next Step: By sweeping away these looming legal hurdles, the ruling clears a path for OpenAI to potentially pursue a massive Initial Public Offering (IPO), with valuations soaring toward the $1 trillion mark.