My attitude towards on-chain interaction with AI Agents is now a bit like: you can run if you want, but don't expect full automation. When the market gets volatile, gas prices spike, routing glitches out, it can place orders faster than I can, but whether to stop or not still depends on human judgment. Especially in lending, liquidation thresholds, collateral fluctuations, oracles occasionally acting up... Agents can monitor numbers fine, but if something goes wrong, I’m still the one holding the bag.



And about permissions—honestly, the signing/authorization step, I really don’t dare to fully delegate to scripts; even if they’re smart, they could be tricked by phishing contracts and taken away. Recently, the staking unlocks, token unlock calendars are being dug up daily to scare myself, Agents might act early according to rules, but they can’t grasp the emotional aspect of “should we temporarily change the rules?”

I no longer chase explanations, I accept randomness. Anyway, I just let it do monitoring + alerts + small test trades; if I want to leverage or switch to a bigger position, I still manually confirm... Anxiety aside, the control is still mine.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned