I just translated a DAO proposal, which on the surface reads "Optimize Incentives," but basically it's about shifting voting power among certain groups: either giving delegates more influence or ensuring market makers/contributors have a more stable voting bloc. The proposal text itself is quite gentle, but the real story is in the attachments and parameters—who can receive subsidies, how they receive them, and for how long—these details essentially set the stage for future disputes.

Recently, the attention has shifted rapidly to Meme and celebrity endorsements, with folks in the group constantly advising newcomers not to take the final step. I think DAO voting is the same: don’t just look at the slogans, pay attention to "who gets rewarded, who gets diluted, and who ultimately makes the decision." I usually follow the voting patterns of two or three major addresses first, listening to small broadcasts—it’s pretty interesting. How about you?