Recently, I've seen everyone hype up AI Agents automatically handling tasks on the chain, which does sound pretty appealing, but honestly, someone still needs to be responsible. For example, that one signature—no matter how smart the Agent is, it's just a "suggestion." When it comes to setting large authorization limits or deciding whether to approve infinitely, I still prefer to review it myself; otherwise, if something goes wrong, I can only blame myself. Also, before contract interactions, there's the question of "is this address really that pool or that router?" Currently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems are criticized for being laggy or even misleading. If the Agent reads the wrong tag, it can be quite awkward.



My current approach is a bit rough: run a small amount first, check the event logs to see if everything looks normal before adding more; revoke permissions once used up; when dealing with cross-chain, aggregators, or unfamiliar contracts, I prefer to go slower rather than letting it operate fully automatically. Automation can save me time, but when it comes to risk, ultimately, someone has to take responsibility. If I mess up, feel free to criticize me.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned