Recently, there have been people on the blockchain taking screenshots and saying "coincidental transfers,"

A just bought B and then started transferring coins, C kept selling, making it look like a performance.
Honestly, many of these can be broken down into paths: first, batch consolidating into the same intermediary wallet (exchange/studio/multisig),
then going through authorization contracts, splitting into several hot wallets to do the work, and finally flowing back for settlement.
It looks like a conspiracy, but actually it's just the "arbitrage roadmap" being too obvious.

Why am I staying calm? My habit is: when I see a chart, I hold back first,
then casually trace two hops forward and backward, and check whether they share the same funding source or have fixed time intervals.
If it can be explained, don’t overthink it; if it can’t be explained, just note it down first, no need to rush to conclusions.

The same applies to the collapse points of blockchain games: inflation + studio + coin price spiral,
a bunch of "coincidences" on the chain are actually just assembly lines running…
Anyway, I only pick up some at the floor level, not going all-in, to avoid emotions running high and turning them into fuel.