Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
To break the net value dilemma, some "consumption" funds are reallocating to technology.
Recently, in the face of the continued strength of the technology mainline and the low-level fluctuations of traditional consumption, many thematic funds labeled as “consumption” have started to cross over into the hard technology sector to break the net value dilemma.
Several consumption-themed funds, relying on the philosophy of “everything is consumption,” have heavily invested in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, leading to outstanding performance.
However, some fund managers admit that the “siphoning effect” of the technology sector has greatly squeezed the liquidity of the consumption sector, and for some fund managers pursuing net value rankings, betting on technology is seen as a helpless move.
Although reallocating to AI and semiconductors has brought short-term performance recovery, it has also placed them at the center of the “style drift” controversy.
(The Securities Times)