Recently, governance has become both funny and frustrating: people say "community decision," but a bunch of folks just delegate their votes to a few familiar faces, since they’re too lazy to review proposals. Basically, governance tokens ultimately control not the protocol itself, but who can hold the largest delegation… I even specifically checked the on-chain voting packing order and nonce to see if someone was manipulating the timing of their votes. The conclusion isn’t really a conspiracy; it’s just that the process makes it too easy for power to concentrate. Even more absurd is that some call for decentralization but are daily anxious about unlock schedules and selling pressure, and they still delegate their votes to others—it's quite surreal.