Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I saw another argument in the secondary market about whether royalties should be paid or not. Basically: creators want stable cash flow, trading platforms want to minimize friction, and buyers feel like I’m already paying in the secondary market, why pay again. On paper, royalties seem like a cost, but in reality, it’s delaying the bill for “who pays for ongoing creation” until the very end, which ultimately turns into a moral debate... I fear this kind of muddled accounting the most.
By the way, modularization and DAO layer storytelling developers are having lively discussions, and it’s normal for users to be confused: no matter how the underlying is split, it all comes down to “where the money comes from, where it goes, and who bears the cost.”
If I could only keep one habit: every time I see an income model, I first ask, “Who is paying this money, and why?”