Recently looking at DAO voting proposals, the more I look, the more it seems like "who can write power into incentives." On the surface, it's about funding, growth, and ecosystem cooperation, but a closer look at the terms: how to set voting thresholds, how to divide snapshot weights, who to delegate to, which multi-signature to give emergency permissions to... Basically, it's about turning the steering wheel into your own hands, while also casually handing out some treats for everyone to like. The airdrop season is quite coordinated with this as well, with task platforms both fighting off the "witch" and implementing point systems, with token farming enthusiasts competing just like clocking in at work, and in the end, when voting, they even use "contribution" as a reason. Anyway, now when I look at proposals, I first check "who can veto with one vote/who can change the rules," because otherwise, when a black swan event happens, the first to get hit under the bridge isn't usually the big players, but the spectators.