Recently, the debate over whether to pay royalties in the secondary market has flared up again. To put it simply, everyone wants liquidity, but creators are not just air. I can actually understand buyers complaining about high costs, especially when the market is excited, and the spot/contract funding rates become extreme. The group then starts to debate whether to reverse or continue squeezing the bubble. At such times, who is willing to pay that little extra? But relying solely on "self-discipline" is too fragile, similar to the logic of racing in the mempool: if rules are unstable, it all ends up being a contest of who is more shameless.


What I fear most is not slowness but chaos—slow can be queued, chaos can only be gambled. Anyway, I now only choose projects with clear rules and no tricks in execution. I prefer fewer transactions to avoid headaches.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned