Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I’ve been doing "version updates" for my small set of images... In the past, when I looked at address profile tags, I would trust about 70-80% of who wrote "whale/smart money," and I felt more at ease once I drew the chart. Now, the more I look, the more it feels like sticking sticky notes on people: the same batch of money circles around, opening multiple addresses, and the tags start to get carried away. Honestly, they can only serve as clues, not conclusions.
Especially these past two days, Layer 2 projects are arguing over TPS, fees, and subsidies—who’s more aggressive. I actually want to see whether the funds have really stayed: whether they’re just here to grab some subsidies and leave, or if the protocol’s cash flow can sustain it. I still use address clustering, but I’ve lowered my "credibility" parameter for myself... For now, that’s it. I’ll watch and see slowly.