Recently, I've seen everyone praising AI Agents that can run fully automated on the blockchain, but I actually worry that they might be too "diligent." Checking data, comparing rates, scanning TVL—leaving these to it is quite convenient, but when it comes to signing, who to authorize, and how much limit to set, I still prefer to confirm myself. Especially after the recent issues with cross-chain bridges, I'm more sensitive to the idea of "auto-crossing," and I'd rather go slower.

And sometimes, oracles have glitches in their quotes, and the community's tacit understanding of "wait for confirmation first" feels very human... Agent might only see that trigger conditions are met and then execute, without emotions or hesitation. To put it simply, anything that can be automated should be automated, but there still needs to be someone watching over the fallback parts: stop if there's an anomaly, don’t be greedy and skip that step. Anyway, for protocols like mine that pick up niche projects, taking it slow feels more reliable.