Recently, I've been translating some wreckage of projects related to "shared security" and "re-staking." Basically, it's repeatedly using the same collateral as a ticket. The returns look quite attractive, but the risks are quietly stacking up: penalties, shutdowns, contract vulnerabilities—none of which can be offset by "an extra layer of interest." In the group, rumors about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging have been circulating back and forth over the past few days. Everyone is claiming to be stable while their palms are sweating. It's very similar to the sentiment around re-staking—packaging uncertainty as certainty. Next time, I might first figure out whether the worst-case scenario could wipe everything out before taking action. What do you value most when choosing re-staking assets?