The biggest scam in the crypto market is that you can never be held responsible for your opinions.

I spent almost an hour today on the @FUDmarkets testnet.
Opened several markets, looked at the rankings, and casually clicked into others' public theoretical positions.
The more I looked, the more I felt that the focus of this thing isn't the trading interface but accountability.
In the past few years, CT has become a very strange place.
Everyone is sharing opinions, but no one bears the consequences of those opinions.
Someone shouted long-term value investing yesterday, chased memes today, and switched to macro narratives the day after, all without any cost.
But FUD dismantled this structure because here, opinions are not posts but positions.
You can openly go long or short, and others can follow you or do the opposite.
Your theory directly maps to profit and loss, and this psychological pressure is completely on a different level from just tweeting casually.
I even think this is closer to crypto-native than most social trading products.
Because the crypto world isn't driven by institutional trust, but by public actions.
And there's a point many people overlook: why is infrastructure like GenLayer important?
Because when the market starts to operate around opinions and trust, the system needs to judge context, behavior, and authenticity, not just blindly follow rigid rules.
Traditional blockchains are more like calculators; this kind of market is more like a social system. The interesting thing about FUD is right here.
It made me feel for the first time that the end goal of CT might not be content platforms but open belief markets.