Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
here we are! the first known zero-day developed with ai just got caught by google.
someone used an llm to spot a flaw in an open-source admin tool. then had the model write a python script that bypasses 2fa on it. then started using it on real targets.
how do we know it was ai? clean docstrings everywhere. a cvss severity score the model literally hallucinated. nobody writes python this tidy at 3am hunting bugs.
the bug itself was a logic flaw, a trust assumption some dev hard-coded years ago. the kind of mistake llms are good at catching.
for years the question was "could ai help attackers?" lots of hedging. "in theory." "eventually." "with enough scaffolding."
that debate is done.
the new question is how fast the window closes between "vuln exists somewhere in your stack" and "vuln gets exploited at scale." it used to be months. it's days now.