Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
DEX tokens are emerging as rare sources of actual revenue distribution to holders in crypto.
AERO alone distributed more than $30M year-to-date, ahead of UNI, CAKE, and CRV combined in some cases.
The market spent years asking which governance tokens had real value capture, now we're finally getting measurable answers.
YTD 2026 distributions (Jan 1 – May 10):
> AERO: $30.68M
> ETH: $19.17M
> UNI: $11.10M
> CAKE: $11.07M
> CRV: $6.57M
The numbers tell a clear story about architecture.
@AerodromeFi model is simple:
> 100% of trading fees go to veAERO voters
> LPs get compensated through token emissions instead
> No split between multiple stakeholders
@Uniswap does it differently:
> UNI holders receive around 16-25% of LP fees in certain pools
> Fees directed to token burns rather than distributions
> Smaller percentage of total protocol revenue flows to holders
That architectural difference matters when you're generating revenue at scale.
AERO's structural advantages compound in ways that reinforce each other:
> Commands 60%+ of Base's DEX market share
> Base transactions cost roughly 50x less than Ethereum mainnet, enabling more trading frequency and higher volume per dollar of liquidity
> Integrated bribes ecosystem adds a second revenue stream where external projects literally pay veAERO voters to direct emissions toward their pools
Since August 2023, AERO has distributed over $295 million cumulatively to holders. Uniswap activated fee distributions in December 2025 after setting up a Wyoming DUNA structure that solved the legal issues around securities classification.
When you annualize the 4.5-month YTD data, the yield gap becomes clear:
> AERO: ~17.8% on circulating market cap
> CAKE: ~6.6%
> CRV: ~2.5-3.5%
> UNI: ~0.3-0.4%
Those yields represent real cash flows to token holders, not speculative returns. Understanding the full picture requires looking at gross yield versus net yield, and this is where things get interesting.
AERO's price moved from $0.97 in July 2025 to around $0.50 in May 2026 while distributions hit record highs. The dynamic reveals what actually matters in DeFi tokenomics beyond headline numbers.
AERO inflates its supply roughly 35% annually through LP emissions, and most liquidity providers sell those tokens to realize gains. The math is clear: if you're receiving 17.8% in distributions while token supply expands 35% annually, your actual net position depends entirely on whether you're locked or holding spot tokens.
The rebase mechanism is the critical piece:
> veAERO lockers receive proportional rebases that offset dilution from emissions
> This keeps their percentage ownership of total supply intact
> Spot holders don't get this protection
This is why the governance token value capture question has a more nuanced answer than most people expect. The tokens that win long-term deliver positive net yield after emissions, not just impressive gross distribution numbers.
What the data actually proves across the top performers:
> AERO: 100% fee distribution to locked holders works at scale
> UNI: Even giants can flip the switch with the right legal structure
> CAKE: Aggressive buyback-and-burn creates real supply reduction
The relationship between distributions and token performance shows the core dynamic clearly: paying holders matters, but understanding dilution matters just as much.
AERO's 17.8% distribution yield on roughly $460-500M market cap represents serious value flow. The ve(3,3) model with lock mechanisms and rebase protections aligns protocol revenue with long-term holder incentives in ways that pure governance tokens never could.
Base keeps growing as an L2, AERO dominates its market share, and dual revenue streams from fees plus bribes position the protocol for sustained distribution capacity going forward.
The shift from theoretical tokenomics to measurable cash flows marks a new phase for DeFi governance tokens.
We've got data now showing:
> Which models work at scale
> Which legal structures enable activation
> Which mechanisms actually protect holder value through different market conditions
For long-term DeFi investors, net yield matters way more than headline numbers. Calculate distributions minus dilution to understand what you're actually getting.
Which DEX tokens are you tracking for net yield in 2026?