Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Schwartz: Ripple Doesn't Control Consensus - U.Today
He has detailed why the network’s native token is not used to secure the blockchain.
Why XRP is not used for consensus
An X user questioned a previous statement made by Schwartz comparing proof of work (PoW), proof of stake (PoS), and the XRPL
HOT Stories
Schwartz: Ripple Doesn’t Control Consensus
Bitcoin (BTC), XRP, Shiba Inu (SHIB), Toncoin (TON) and Zcash (ZEC) Price Analysis for May 13: Hiding Explosive Volatility Potential
Schwartz had previously noted the XRPL relies on “stakeholder chosen scarcity.” For comparison, PoW uses computing power, and PoS uses the value of a native token.
The user asked whether XRP itself was the asset “chosen” to be scarce in this model
Schwartz was quick to explain that the token plays no role in consensus, and there are two main reasons why this is the case
First of all, when the XRPL was being developed, Proof of Stake “hadn’t been invented yet, and we weren’t clever enough to think of it.”
More importantly, as Schwartz has noted, using XRP to drive the consensus mechanism “would have left Ripple in control of the consensus mechanism whether people wanted that or not.”
The XRPL relies on what Schwartz calls “shareholder choice.” Network participants choose to come to a consensus with validators they believe are doing a good job.
The best incentive is no incentive
In his 2020 lecture, Schwartz argued that artificial financial rewards actually harm the network’s actual users. He noted that the primary technical hurdle is that “eventual consistency is needed for blockchains to be useful,” but argued that paying exorbitant fees to solve this problem is inefficient.
Schwartz fundamentally views built-in mining or staking rewards as a net negative: “artificial incentives are attacks on the natural stakeholders, and they represent friction left in the system.”
As he explained, “natural incentives decentralize the only reason to participate in the system is because you want the system to work reliably there is nothing for you to take from the system.”