When pressed "Are you trustworthy?", Altman’s court admits to lying and engaging in cross-investment bribery

According to Beating Monitoring, during the cross-examination in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI, Musk’s attorney Steven Molo bypassed the obscure structural disputes and directly launched a series of attacks on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s personal morals and integrity.
“Are you a completely trustworthy person?” “Do you only say what others want to hear, regardless of truth or falsehood?”
Faced with a large number of former employee testimonies presented by the lawyer, Altman abandoned perfect defense.
He admitted in court, “There have been moments in life when I did not tell the truth,” and also confessed that he had heard business partners call him a “liar” behind his back.
To prove that Altman is using OpenAI for personal gain, the lawyer presented a glaring “conflict of interest list”:
Altman’s personally invested fusion startup Helion Energy and chip manufacturer Cerebras both have deep business collaborations with OpenAI.
In response to the sharp question, “As a board member, would you fire yourself for these behaviors?” Altman only stiffly replied, “I have no such intention.”
As this round of questioning ended, Musk’s tactical intentions were fully exposed:
Since it is difficult to completely dismantle OpenAI’s $730 billion valuation through business logic, the strategy is to pin the company’s leader on the moral shame of “profiteering and lying.”